The rules were clear. If you don't get an 18, you fail the exam and your score will not count towards the ranking.  https://sunvalleynhs.depedparanaquecity.com/history/

No one could benefit from anything if they didn't get 18. Why bother with some sort of rule for rounding decimals? Clearly, there was no need for it, and in fact, the ministerial regulations merely acknowledge it.

This is why Ministerial Decree 418/25, in art. 6, clarified that "for the purposes of determining the exam grade for the student's career, the scores achieved in the tests are rounded to the nearest whole number only if the student has passed the exam with a score equal to or greater than eighteen out of thirty (18/30)".

The rule, therefore, could only be related to the student's career (only) since the rules for the ranking were already written allowing, in that case, the rounding of decimals beyond ".5".

This was, upon closer inspection, an almost tautological clarification. The student's career would not have begun even if a mark of 18 had not been achieved in every exam at the national level. Clearly, this rule, designed for a system in which the rigid indication of failure for failing a grade of 18 was clearly justified, as mentioned, in direct conflict with the current rules. The useful grade is rounded up, not the useless one. The rule, then, should be Copernicanally changed when the Ministry itself no longer assigns any value to the 18 threshold, which has only now decided to change  https://oceanicstarshipping.com/contact.php

It is therefore unlawful for all those who obtained a score between 17.5 and 17.9 in one of the exams that the Ministry did not apply the rounding rule to these exams as well, despite the contrary, a widening of all the other widely known threshold parameters.

Clearly, a matter such as the one we have discussed can be pursued individually or collectively, but in the latter case, only together with other parties in the same procedural position, albeit with inevitable, albeit limited, critical issues linked to restrictive jurisprudence on such actions.

For information and to join our campaign, please write to  Questo indirizzo e-mail è protetto dallo spam bot. Abilita Javascript per vederlo. .